... the marks on "Collection - Diversity, depth, 
and curator knowledge of his or her collection" 
are lower (as yours and mine are) than most 
collections where the curators put cels together 
randomly and provide absolutely no information on 
the context of their cels.  You've obviously put 
a lot of time in on this collection, and it hurts 
when people rate you down precisely for the good 
work that you have done.

A perennial problem in college teaching, btw.  If 
you put in a major effort in upgrading your 
classes, by adding new texts, technology, student-
focused activities, etc., you can always expect 
student evaluations to zing you at the end of the 
semester, even if the new stuff is successful.  
That's because most people are happier with the 
same old same old.

BTW, I'm not a Sailor Moon fan, but I think your 
MKR cels show that you have taste like mine: 
characters in intense action vs. head-on "nice" 
facials with plenty of square millimeters of 
opened eyes. 

It could just be that action-oriented galleries 
like ours just don't appeal to those who cruise 
through galleries just looking at the 
thumbnails.  To appreciate them, you have to stop 
and click and explore.  (I like the way you 
include the screen shots to help do this.) Most 
people, I'd guess, don't have time to do this.

Probably this discussion ought to be mirrored 
over at Rubberslug's forum (if it isn't already), 
where Jason can put his 2 cents in.  I don't 
think this is what he planned when he created the 
rating system.